This site is copyrighted, supported, and maintained by the Equal Justice Foundation.
| EJF Home | Join the EJF | Comments? | Get EJF newsletter | Newsletters |
| DV Home | Abstract | Contents | Tables | Index | Bibliography |
| Chapter 8 Demographics Of Domestic Violence In Colorado |
| Next Demographics of domestic violence in Colorado - 2004 |
| Back Demographics of domestic violence in Colorado - 2002 |
The fiscal year 2003 statistics for the Colorado courts for domestic violence charges, with associated mandatory restraining orders, are given in their Table 31, with a total of 16,159, and civil restraining orders are tabulated in their Table 29, totaling 14,972 (8,287 of these orders are for domestic abuse), for a combined total of 31,131, up 2,102 (7%) from the previous year. These tables are compiled by the State Court Administrator's Office and are available from the Colorado State Court Web site and are combined and presented here in Table 47.
County populations: U.S. Census Bureau Restraining orders and divorces: Colorado State Court Tables 16, 29, and 31 |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Prior to fiscal 2002 the courts lumped all civil restraining orders together. Statistics for 2002 and subsequent years separate civil and domestic abuse (DA) orders. For consistency with prior years both the total number and (domestic abuse) restraining orders are given. Again for consistency, the total number of civil restraining orders plus domestic violence cases is used to calculate percentages and per capita values. Where domestic abuse orders exceed 50% the values are shown in (bold). 2. A restraining order is mandated by law C.R.S. § 18-1-1001. 3. Average is from the sum of civil and criminal restraining orders (31,131) divided by the state population minus Denver City and County. 4. Divorces includes all dissolutions, legal separations, and invalid marriage. |
From 2002 on the State Court Administrator has broken the number of restraining orders issued into the separate categories of (a) domestic abuse and (b) all others. The number of restraining orders issued in each judicial district are shown in parentheses (number of domestic abuse orders) in Table 47. The values for judicial districts where more than half the restraining orders are for domestic abuse are shown in (bold). However, for consistency with data from previous years, it is necessary to use the total number of restraining orders for each judicial district and accept the inherent bias.
As shown in Table 47 and Table 79, the per capita number of restraining orders continues to increase over time, from 62 in 1998 to 78 in 2003, a 26% increase in just six years. This trend does not suggest the domestic violence problem is being solved, or offenders deterred, by current law and practice.
The mean number of restraining orders for twenty-one of the twenty-two Colorado judicial districts for 2003 is 88 per 10,000 residents, with a standard deviation of 28 (Table 47).
In terms of the rate of restraining orders, the Third, Fourth, Tenth, Twelfth, and Sixteenth judicial districts again lead the state for the year 2003 with 136, 115, 137, 106, and 153 restraining orders per 10,000 citizens respectively (Table 47). May god have pity on children and families in these draconian districts.
A simple test of equity is the percentage of restraining orders issued in a judicial district versus the percentage of the population residing in that district. If uniform standards were being applied the percent of population would roughly equal the percent of restraining orders issued in that district. Any variance should diminish as the sample size increases. Thus large judicial districts like the Fourth, Seventeenth, Eighteenth, and Twentieth should show smaller variances than small districts like the Third, Fifteenth, Sixteenth, and Twenty Second.
Allowing for differences in the populations of the judicial districts we still find in Table 47 that again in 2003 the Fourth Judicial District has issued an exceptionally high number of restraining orders (21.1% of total) relative to its percentage of the state population (14.3%) sampled.
Although small districts, the Third (1% of orders, 0.6% of population) and Sixteenth (1.5% of orders, 0.8% of population) judicial districts consistently issue a much greater percentage of restraining orders than their populations would suggest.
While larger judicial districts, the Tenth (6.5% of orders, 3.7% of population) and the Nineteenth (6.5% of orders, 5.3% of population) also fall into this category.
These five judicial districts fail this simple test of equity.
Table 48 is a continuing attempt, for six years now, to see where and whether restraining orders and domestic violence correlate with other societal problems. The implicit assumption in Table 48, as in previous years, is that domestic violence is associated with other social problems such as alcoholism, drug use, etc. For example, underage alcohol abuse and drug use would be associated with abusive or broken homes, and that Joe Six Pack likely gets into other kinds of trouble, e.g., bar brawls, for which he is arrested as well.
Kit Carson, Logan, Morgan, Phillips, Sedgwick, Washington, and Yuma |
|||||||
County populations: U.S. Census Bureau Misdemeanors: Colorado State Court Table 31. |
|||||||
1. Offenses against persons includes the crimes of assault, child abuse, forgery, harassment, and menacing. 2. Offenses against property includes the crimes of arson, criminal mischief, and theft. 3. Values that differ from the state average for a given offense by one standard deviation or more are shown in bold. |
| EJF Home | Join the EJF | Comments? | Get EJF newsletter | Newsletters |
| DV Home | Abstract | Contents | Tables | Index | Bibliography |
| Chapter 8 Demographics Of Domestic Violence In Colorado |
| Next Demographics of domestic violence in Colorado - 2004 |
| Back Demographics of domestic violence in Colorado - 2002 |
This site is supported and maintained by the Equal Justice Foundation.